Stan Levco, former Vanderburgh County prosecutor, is a criminal. As shocking as it sounds, this is a reasonable conclusion if you consider it a crime to knowingly present perjury in a criminal trial. In the last election, the voters chose the upstart Nicholas Hermann over Levco, the entrenched political power, suggesting that they expected some kind of change.
But did we get any kind of change? Or, is one prosecutor about the same as another? Is Stan Levco really gone?
Nicholas Hermann had an excellent opportunity to differentiate himself from his corrupt predecessor when Patrick Bradford's Petition for Post-Conviction Relief came before the Court on Oct. 11-12, 2011. The trial record in that case is replete with undeniable, documented perjuries, all knowingly presented by Stan Levco. No honest person would want to be associated with such a crime. But Mr. Hermann chose to defend it. In so doing, he has made himself equally guilty.
No doubt Hermann made his choice for the sake of political expediency (or gain). But it was not just political calculation; it was a moral choice. Now we know all we need to about Nicholas Hermann. Now we know exactly what kind of prosecutor we have: the same as the one we had before.
Stan Levco has not yet left the building.
I have not examined the evidence Levco used to convict Bradford. But I know, as a logical thinking man, that Levco is indeed a criminal. His name comes from the ancient crime group called Levites which is one hundred percent Hebrew or Jewish. Working from this premise I can conclude that what you say about the trial is quite possible. But once a jury has spoken it is not easy to rescind that decision. All BAR attorneys are part of the crime group and it is very hard to find an honest one. It would appear to me that attorneys are just dishonest by nature. Money has its attached corrupting influence which seems to be irresistible to them. That is all they seem to care about.
ReplyDeleteAre you really suggesting that you know Levco is guilty because you believe his last name suggests he is of Jewish descent? Seriously?
DeleteAs a "logical thinking man" I'm astonished that you would suggest something so hateful and ignorant.
I absolutely believe that Levco is guilty of wrong doing and I believe that Patrick Bradford is innocent of murder. Not because his last name is Bradford, but because the man was not given a fair trial and evidence and testimony was tampered with. Had the case been tried fairly the actual evidence that existed should have exonerated him.
I'm not posting this as an "unknown" person. I'm Sherrie Berglin. What can you presume about me based on my last name?
That is very interesting what you posted about the name "Levco". It certainly suits him. In addition, your comment about the difficulty of undoing what has been done by a jury is spot on. Even in the face of the most ridiculously obvious evidence, the courts insist upon denying any relief. Justice has become confused with maintaining convictions.
ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDelete